The Madministratum

The simple answer the question in the title is: no, the Imperium is not monolithic, and is full of diversity. This, however, is actually itself an oversimplification, and misleading. Because (and apologies for the unwieldy phrasing here) the Imperium is defined by a range of characteristics and themes which serve as broad parameters in which most of the diversity plays out. I will call this dynamic of how the lore functions ‘bounded diversity’ – and will explain what it means in more detail and with reference to specific illustrative examples (religious faith, technology, notions of purity/treatment of mutants) to make the concept as easy to understand as possible. Now, the Imperium is absolutely massive and some worlds may be particularly remote and isolated or have specific historical quirks, and so exceptions to this general dynamic and the broad parameters can and do exist within it. But in general, the key point is, there are certain characteristics and themes which shape most of ...

I am just making this post to clear up a common misconception: the notion that the idea of a multiverse in Warhammer (and 40k more specifically) is a recent addition to the lore. And this claim is sometimes followed by a further claim that GW have introduced this concept as part of an effort to make 40k more like the MCU. However, the idea of a Warhammer (or Games Workshop) multiverse has been evident in the lore since at least 1987, the year when Warhammer Fantasy 3rd edition and 40k were launched, and both settings were explicitly connected to one another and the Warp/Realm of Chaos (more on that here: https://www.reddit.com/r/40kLore/comments/1k94fv5/extracts_the_warhammer_fantasy_world_was_once/ ) Though hardly focused on in a sustained manner, each rulebook contained a reference to the notion of a multiverse when discussing the (Old) Slann, the mysterious precursor race who played an important role in shaping the ancient history of both settings (with his role later being transfe...

 And this is what it said: The borders of the dominions of Chaos lie in many places throughout time and space. One such place is upon the eastern marches of the land of Irysia - at the gigantic bottomless fissure known as the Crack of Desolation. One one side lies the Kingdoms of Men - Irysia - on the other only Chaos. The realm of Chaos is one of eternal mists and movement, the shifting, changing ground devoid of plants or life of any natural kind, the air swirling with impenetrable mists. In this place of ultimate insanity roam the unnatual (sic.) creatures spawned by Chaos and their grotesque masters - the Chaos Gods: they hunger to expand the compass through all of time, and through all of space. One day they will succeed. The Quest for Chaos (1983), p. 1. (Image available here: https://www.chaosium.com/product_images/uploaded_images/quest-for-chaos.jpeg ) To add some context here, when Warhammer Fantasy was first launched, it wasn't really a setting. It was ruleset created fo...

 To round of a trilogy of posts about Servitors, here is a final offering on the history of the concept of Servitors within the lore, and how the concept solidified into the current notion we recognize today. To start, let’s establish the more general definition of the word ‘servitor’ outside of 40k, where it refers to somebody bound in service to another/others – though this is now a very archaic term. Collins English Dictionary , for example, defines it as: Archaic A person who serves another Word origin C14: from Old French servitour, from Late Latin servītor, from Latin servīre to serve You can see how and why it was used for Servitors in 40k. But, perhaps surprisingly, given how much of an iconic and ubiquitous element of 40k they were to become, back at the launch of 1st edition (Rogue Trader), Servitors (as in the mind-wiped cyborgs) did not yet exist. Indeed, the only use of the word in the original rulebook was here: The Adeptus Mechanicus are the servitors of technology, ...

Following on from a recent post about whether Servitors are mainly made from naturally-born or vat-grown people/bodies, this is just a follow-up on one specific type of Servitor: Cherubim. Often also called Cherubs. You know the ones: the creepy little things that look like chubby, malformed babies, with angel wings attached. Now, I haven’t actually found that many accounts of how exactly they are made, or what they are made from – but there are some clear descriptions. The most recent statement is pretty conclusive: Cherubim A common sight in the upper ranks of the Imperium’s Adepta, Cherubim are regarded as a symbol of purity. They are a diminutive variant of Servitor, not truly alive but vat-grown to resemble genderless children with tiny feathered wings. Imperium Maledictum Inquisition Player’s Guide (2024), p. 111. And a decade and a half earlier, we were told: The bio-constructs known as cherubim are of uncertain origin, but they are one of the few permitted examples of such bio...

TLDR: There is no basis to claim the majority of Servitors are vat-grown. The lore generally showcases that there are large proportions of both natural and vat-grown Servitors. The only explicit statement we have states a greater proportion are made from natural humans. I survey the relevant lore across the decades. This is the first in a short series of posts about Servitors, and also another post which debunks a common myth in the fandom. Hopefully we are all aware of Servitors: the mind-wiped (though not always totally successfully…) cyborg automatons which are ubiquitous across most of the Imperium, undertaking a wide range of tasks. But where do the bodies used to produce Servitors come from? Are they mainly vat-grown for the purpose? Or are the bodies and/or corpses of naturally-born people (which I will refer to as ‘organic’) the main source? If you look at discussions about Servitors which appear on this sub and elsewhere, a lot of people claim – very confidently – that it is t...